On this 18 January, LXI A.S. 9sense podcast episode, Magister Campbell will discuss What is Year One, Trump’s Greenland Threat, and The Bone Temple Spoiler. Join LIVE in YouTube chat and share your thoughts! This episode will be added to the audio podcast feed the following day.
Time Stamps
- 0:00 Intro
- 12:55 1. The Devil’s Advocate – What is Year One
- 27:23 2. Infernal Informant – Trump’s Greenland Threat
- 45:35 3. Creature Feature – The Bone Temple Spoiler
- 1:00:46 Outro
Show Notes
Intro
Welcome to 9sense. 9sense is a Satanic perspective of our modern world. I am your host Magister Campbell, it’s great to have you. It’s January 18th and I’ve got a hell-of-a show for you this week!
- Irony of law loving supporters of trump
- ICE, Greenland, Epstein
- Guardians of Pedophiles, GOP
Discussion
1. The Devil’s Advocate
- Letters to the High Priest
- Letters from the Devil
- National Insider – October 19, 1969
- What is Year One?
- Numerical parallels to the Number of the Beast in the biblical Book of Revelation
- The end of a religious age of ice, start of the satanic age of fire
- Astrologers refer to this as the Aquarious age
- 1966 saw religions hitting their biggest slump in history
- Satanic Law of the Nine
- Cycling ages of time always equate to various chronological periods of nine
- Years of Satanic Importance happen every 18 years
- Nine 18 year periods are workings, produce an era
- Nine eras produce a civilization
- 1966 was the beginning year of a new civilization, era and working in one fell swoop
- hence, the Satanic year one
- Founding of the Church of Satan
- The next working year is 1984, then 2002, 2020, 2038…
- 1984, Blanche Barton started up with LaVey
- 2002, Blanche Barton Magistra Templi Rex transferred power from High Priest to Peggy Nadramia on Walpurgisnacht
- 2020, 9 year anniversary of 9sense
- 2128 will be the end of the working or era.
2. Infernal Informant
- A stunned Europe finally wakes up to Trump’s Greenland threat
- https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/18/europe/europe-greenland-threat-tariffs-analysis-intl
- It’s not often that Europe speaks with one voice – or responds with such urgency.
- But US President Donald Trump’s announcement Saturday of sanctions against several European countries that reject any US claim to Greenland, a Danish territory, was one of those moments.
- An emergency meeting of EU ambassadors will take place in Brussels on Sunday in response to Trump’s threat, which he made after an estimate quarter of the population of Greenland’s capital Nuuk joined protests against any potential annexation.
- Across the continent, among allies that usually tread carefully in responding to utterances from the White House, the response was immediate and emphatic, and recognized an existential threat to the transatlantic alliance.
- French President Emmanuel Macron, who has tried to cultivate a good personal relationship with Trump, led the charge – describing the threat of tariffs as “unacceptable.”
- “No intimidation or threat will influence us – neither in Ukraine, nor in Greenland, nor anywhere else in the world when we are confronted with such situations,” he said on X.
- “Europeans will respond in a united and coordinated manner should they be confirmed. We will ensure that European sovereignty is upheld.”
- UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer chimed in, saying in a statement that “applying tariffs on allies for pursuing the collective security of NATO allies is completely wrong.”
- Even Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, who has typically had positive relations with the US President, described the move as an “error” in a handout video from a state visit to South Korea.
- Revealing she had already had a phone conversation with Trump, Meloni said she “doesn’t agree” with the idea of imposing tariffs against countries that contribute to Greenland’s security.
- Eight European countries, including the United Kingdom, Germany and France, issued a joint statement Sunday saying that, “tariff threats undermine transatlantic relations and risk a dangerous downward spiral. We will continue to stand united and coordinated in our response.”
- Trump, in a lengthy social media post Saturday, said the United States needed possession of Greenland to counter Chinese and Russian threats in the Arctic and develop what he has called the Golden Dome to protect North America from ballistic missiles.
- Experts say that the US does not need to own Greenland for the Dome to be effective, thanks to a 1951 agreement that gives the US the right to build defense facilities on the island.
- The Pituffik Space Base, which US Vice President JD Vance visited last March, is focused on missile warning, space surveillance, and satellite command and control missions.
- European politicians said Trump’s unilateralism over Greenland, and his treatment of long-standing allies, was playing into Moscow and Beijing’s hands.
- “China and Russia must be having a field day. They are the ones who benefit from divisions among allies,” said EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas.
- Spain’s Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez took a similar line. In an interview with Spanish newspaper La Vanguardia, he said any military action by the U.S. against Denmark’s vast Arctic island would damage NATO and delight Russian President Vladimir Putin.
- It would make Putin “the happiest man in the world. Why? Because it would legitimize his attempted invasion of Ukraine,” he said.
- “If the United States were to use force, it would be the death knell for NATO. Putin would be doubly happy,” Sanchez warned.
- “The measures against NATO allies announced today will not help in ensuring security in the Arctic,” said the President of the European Parliament, Roberta Metsola on X. “They risk the opposite, emboldening our joint enemies and those who wish to destroy our common values and way of life.”
- One casualty of the tariff threat may be the US-EU trade deal agreed last year, which the European Parliament was set to debate this week. The leader of the largest group in the assembly, Manfred Weber, said on X that “given Donald Trump’s threats regarding Greenland, approval is not possible at this stage.”
- There have been plenty of occasions during both Trump administrations that European governments have reeled in shock at the rhetoric from the White House and then embarked on careful damage limitation.
- But many Europeans recognize in the second Trump administration a far more strident tone, beginning when Vance excoriated Europe as woke, soft on immigration and anti-democratic in a speech at the Munich Security Conference last February.
- Trump’s National Security Strategy in November doubled down on the scorn. “It is far from obvious whether certain European countries will have economies and militaries strong enough to remain reliable allies” two decades from now, it said.
- The document sneered at what it called the “stark prospect of civilizational erasure” in Europe, claiming “censorship of free speech and suppression of political opposition, cratering birthrates, and loss of national identities and self-confidence.”
- And earlier this month, Trump’s deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller told CNN’s Jake Tapper, “We live in a world, in the real world… that is governed by strength, that is governed by force, that is governed by power.”
- “For the United States to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend NATO and NATO interests, obviously, Greenland should be part of the United States,” Miller added.
- Essentially, in this White House, a strong transatlantic relationship is no longer thought critical to US national security or its dominance of the Western hemisphere.
- But strong words from the capitals of Europe are just that: The challenge is to build greater self-reliance in defense and security, a process that takes decades rather than months.
- In the meantime, some may recall then UK Prime Minister Winston Churchill’s exasperation over the planning for D-Day, the operation that would liberate Western Europe from Nazi Germany.
- “There is only one thing worse than fighting with allies, and that is fighting without them,” Churchill said later.
3. Creature Feature
- The Bone Temple Spoiler
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/28_Years_Later:_The_Bone_Temple
- Log Line
- As Spike is inducted into Jimmy Crystal’s gang on the mainland, Dr. Kelson makes a discovery that could alter the world.
- 2026 post-apocalyptic horror film directed by Nia DaCosta and written by Alex Garland. It was shot back-to-back with its predecessor 28 Years Later (2025), and serves as the fourth installment overall in the 28 Days Later film series.
- Ratings
- https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/28_years_later_the_bone_temple 93% fresh, 89% audience
- https://www.imdb.com/title/tt32141377/ 7.8/10
- Cast
- Ralph Fiennes as Dr Ian Kelson, a former GP dedicated to memorialising the victims of the epidemic.
- Jack O’Connell as Sir Lord Jimmy Crystal, a psychopathic gang leader who styles himself after Jimmy Savile.[5]
- Alfie Williams as Spike, a teenager who is on a personal quest on the mainland.
- Erin Kellyman as Jimmy Ink / Kelly, one of the Fingers, who befriends Spike.
- Chi Lewis-Parry as “Samson“, a physically imposing Alpha leader of the infected.
- Emma Laird as Jimmima, one of the Fingers.
- Sam Locke as Jimmy Fox, one of the Fingers.[6]
- Robert Rhodes as Jimmy Jimmy, one of the Fingers.
- Ghazi Al Ruffai as Jimmy Snake, one of the Fingers.[6]
- Maura Bird as Jimmy Jones, one of the Fingers.
- Connor Newall as Jimmy Shite, one of the Fingers.[7]
- Louis Ashbourne Serkis as Tom, a male survivor.
- Mirren Mack as Cathy, a pregnant survivor.
- David Sterne as George, a male survivor.
- Cillian Murphy makes an uncredited appearance as Jim, a former bicycle courier and survivor of the original outbreak. Murphy reprises his role from 28 Days Later,[8] with his appearance in The Bone Temple’s ending serving as his character’s reintroduction which sets up the planned third film.[9]
- Notes
- The film was announced as part of a planned trilogy, with Alex Garland serving as screenwriter for all three. In January 2025, Danny Boyle confirmed that he would direct the final film in the trilogy.
- Shot back-to-back with its predecessor.
- The bone temple set was constructed from around 5500 skulls and 150,000 bones, each of which was individually cast, attached to 1000 ‘uprights’ or columns.
- the sequel will continue to explore the corrosive effects of human evil, as well as the relationship between the film’s human survivors and those who have been infected by the franchises central rage virus. “This film is the weird, deranged cousin to ’28 Years Later,’ who you might be a bit of Sheen though because they have weird, questionable interests’ O’Connell said”I don’t think the infected are purely antagonists in our film. It definitely will make you consider that.” DaCosta teased, “it’s so hard to describe the tone of the movie that I actually won’t even attempt to. But it keeps the same unique, off the wall, surprising energy.”
- Near the beginning of the film, Samson eats a man’s brain. This is a reference to the stereotype of zombies eating brains, which originated with the film “The Return of the Living Dead” (1985) and subsequent films.
- the film explores themes juxtaposing human violence with innate humanity amid brutality and the infected.
- the theme of the previous film was about the nature of family, Bone Temple would be about the nature of evil, which would lead the next film to be about the nature of redemption.
Outro
That’s it for another episode of 9sense, I hope you enjoyed it. You can view past episodes of my Satanic series on reverendcampbell.com, and wherever you get your podcasts.
If you appreciate the Satanic content I produce, consider becoming a Patreon patron or YouTube member, links are in the description below. I would like to thank my Creator, Producer Patron Azrael and Developer Patrons. Don’t forget to subscribe to this YouTube channel, ring the bell, and click the like button. It all goes to help other Satanists learn about this channel and its content.
If you would like to learn more about Satanism or the Church of Satan, visit churchofsatan.com, and until next week, Hail Satan!